Jul 10, 2024

Many factors go into selecting the best unit pricing oversight model for a firm - regulations, product complexity, service provider capabilities, risk appetite, disaster recovery, and, of course, cost all come into play.

In Cutter’s 2021 Benchmarking survey, Managing Vendors and Service Providers, participating firms referenced the following three challenges directly related to unit price oversight:

  1. The unit price oversight process is a time-consuming and manual process
  2. Monitoring and regularly reviewing service levels and key performance indicators are critical
  3. Numerous and evolving regulatory requirements need to be met, and organizations must be ready for internal and external auditors
Source: 2021 Cutter Associates Benchmark Survey - Managing Vendors and Service Providers

Key Unit Pricing Challenges

Let’s expand on the challenges raised by firms in our Benchmarking survey.

Time-Consuming

When deciding to outsource, firms often underestimate the time it takes to perform oversight on unit pricing. Because firms are familiar with their own product peculiarities, validating a service provider’s unit pricing processes can take more time than you might have allocated.

Service-Level Monitoring and Management

Critical to the unit pricing process, service levels protect both parties and ensure clarity of expectations. They require well-defined roles and responsibilities, a clear understanding of requirements, and considerable negotiation.

Regulatory and Audit

Adherence to regulations is paramount, while firms increasingly wish to maintain a strong regulatory posture via internal and external audit processes. A key tip is to leverage your provider's thought leadership and best practices as guidance.

Regulatory Expectations

Not long ago, many firms shifted responsibility for unit pricing to their service providers. Clearly, this perspective has changed ─ partly due to pressure from regulators that have reminded firms of the difference between accountability and responsibility!

What do regulators expect from firms?

  • Review and alignment of valuation and pricing methodologies
  • Provide evidence of checks on unit prices calculated per client guidelines
  • Clearly understand their business continuity/disaster recovery capability to ensure the unit pricing function can still function during a crisis
  • Produce prices in the event of a service provider failure
  • Defined exit strategy in case the firm decides to bring the function in-house or to switch providers

NAV Oversight Pricing Model

Looking at NAV oversight pricing models, we can revisit the two traditional models and understand newer alternative models that provide more oversight and risk management capabilities.

Risk Management

Firms are encouraged to consider their risk/cost appetite when selecting an oversight model that best suits their needs. Firms with relatively low complexity may find the traditional models to be sufficient for their needs, whereas other firms may require an Independent Validation model.

Possible Vendor Solutions?

Depending on where a firm sits on the risk/cost matrix, you may wish to consider a vendor solution. A broad range of solutions are available, ranging from those integrating NAV Validation into their platforms to those with NAV Projection and Contingency NAV at their core.

Rethinking your unit pricing model or vendor strategy? Connect with Cutter for more information at [email protected].